Filed: Jun. 06, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 461 F.2d 1266 Walton W. MIMS, individually and as a representative of a class of citizens composed of residents and taxpayers of a common geographical subdivision, Appellants, v. W. G. YARBOROUGH et al., Appellees. No. 72-1013. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued May 11, 1972. Decided June 6, 1972. Stanley H. Kohn, Columbia, S. C. (Gerald M. Finkel and Kohn & Finkel, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants. J. Kendall Few and Howard L. Burns, Greenwood, S. C., for appellees
Summary: 461 F.2d 1266 Walton W. MIMS, individually and as a representative of a class of citizens composed of residents and taxpayers of a common geographical subdivision, Appellants, v. W. G. YARBOROUGH et al., Appellees. No. 72-1013. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued May 11, 1972. Decided June 6, 1972. Stanley H. Kohn, Columbia, S. C. (Gerald M. Finkel and Kohn & Finkel, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants. J. Kendall Few and Howard L. Burns, Greenwood, S. C., for appellees...
More
461 F.2d 1266
Walton W. MIMS, individually and as a representative of a
class of citizens composed of residents and
taxpayers of a common geographical
subdivision, Appellants,
v.
W. G. YARBOROUGH et al., Appellees.
No. 72-1013.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 11, 1972.
Decided June 6, 1972.
Stanley H. Kohn, Columbia, S. C. (Gerald M. Finkel and Kohn & Finkel, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants.
J. Kendall Few and Howard L. Burns, Greenwood, S. C., for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and FIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
For the reasons stated by the District Judge, we find no inconsistency between the plans for this water distribution system and the requirements of the federal statutes under which loans and grants have been authorized to finance its construction. Mims v. Yarborough, D.S.C., 343 F. Supp. 1146.
